B5 · Pillar B · Spending Efficiency
Agency consolidation and zero-based review
Apply zero-based review to federal programs, modeled on Canada’s 1995 Program Review. Consolidate duplicative programs (a recurring GAO finding), modernize administrative infrastructure, and tie evaluation more tightly to budget decisions.
- 10-year fiscal
- −$250BSavings
- Implementation
- Years 1–10
- Middle class
- Neutral on average
- Planetary
- Neutral
$100B–$400B · Medium confidence
Localized federal-employment effects warrant transition support.
No material climate effect.
Global precedent
Canada Program Review (1995–2000); New Zealand State Sector Act reforms (1988); UK Spending Reviews.
Lead mechanism
OMB; GAO; House and Senate Budget and Appropriations.
Bipartisan framing
Broadly bipartisan in principle; controversies arise around specific consolidations, not the framework.
Figures in this framework are illustrative directional estimates derived from publicly available data and conventional Congressional Budget Office budget-window logic. They are not official CBO scores. Any provision adopted from this framework would require formal CBO scoring before legislative consideration. This document is a policy white paper, not an introduced bill.