Skip to content

Working Draft — Version 2, 2026 · Policy framework, not an introduced bill

Plan for ProsperityNonpartisan fiscal framework

Pillar D · New in Version 2

Human Flourishing & Societal Infrastructure

Ten policies drawn from country-tested programs in primary care, family leave, teaching, vocational education, social housing, mental health, corrections, community violence, immigration processing, and once-only digital government. Each respects the middle-class hold-harmless mandate and the twenty-year path to 70 percent of GDP.

+$130 billion net · 10 policies · Gross ~$550B offset by ~$420B over 10 years

How to read the indicators

  • Fiscal. 10-year base case. Navy = revenue; green = savings; gold = scored investment cost.
  • Timeline. Highlighted span on a 20-year bar. “+” means work continues past Year 20.
  • Middle class. Hold-harmless test for households $40,000–$150,000.
  • Planetary. Climate and resource effect, independent of the fiscal score.

D1 · Pillar D

Standalone page

Universal primary care and public-option coverage

10-year fiscal
+$180B netInvestment

Gross ~$650B; offsets ~$470B · Medium confidence

Implementation
Years 4–8
Y1Y10Y20
Middle class
Strongly positive

Reduces average out-of-pocket health spending by $1,800–$3,200 a year within five years and removes employer-lock for job changes.

Planetary
Neutral

No material climate effect.

Description

A federally guaranteed universal primary-care benefit — a designated primary-care physician or nurse practitioner, preventive services, chronic-disease management, and basic mental-health integration — with zero out-of-pocket cost at the point of service. Funded through Medicare and Medicaid administrative rails, reallocated ACA marketplace-stabilization subsidies, and a marginal employer-contribution offset. Layered on a public-option plan on every ACA marketplace, priced at Medicare-plus-15 percent for hospital services and Medicare rates for physician services under B2 site-neutral payment. Extends B2 and B3; does not alter Social Security or Medicare benefit structures for current retirees.

Global precedent

Germany’s Gesetzliche Krankenversicherung (GKV); the Netherlands’ Zorgverzekeringswet (Zvw); Australia’s Medicare. All three achieve near-universal coverage at 10–12 percent of GDP — six to eight points below current U.S. spending — with better preventable-mortality outcomes.

Lead mechanism

HHS; CMS; Senate Finance; House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Health; House Energy and Commerce.

Bipartisan framing

Conservative case

Primary-care access without a single-payer takeover; competition from a public option priced on Medicare rails; reduced emergency-room cost shifting.

Progressive case

Universal primary-care coverage and a public option on every marketplace, with zero point-of-service cost for preventive and chronic care.

State-level public-option or primary-care expansions have been enacted in Democratic-led states; a standalone primary-care benefit polls above 60 percent across parties.

D2 · Pillar D

Standalone page

Maternal, infant, and family-leave continuity

10-year fiscal
+$210B netInvestment

Gross ~$280B; offsets ~$70B · Medium-High confidence

Implementation
Years 2–5
Y1Y10Y20
Middle class
Strongly positive

$8,000–$14,000 per birth or serious family-medical event. No new levy on households in the hold-harmless band.

Planetary
Neutral

No material climate effect.

Description

Federal paid family and medical leave of 12 weeks at 80 percent of wages up to a cap, administered through state partnerships. Universal home-visiting for new parents in the first year. A maternal-mortality initiative covering perinatal care standards, Medicaid midwife and doula reimbursement, and standardized obstetric emergency protocols. An infant-mortality reduction fund on the Healthy Start model at four times current scale. Complements C4 upstream; C4 scoring is unchanged.

Global precedent

Sweden’s Föräldrapenning (480 days of shareable parental leave); Germany’s Elterngeld; Norway’s paid-leave model. The United States is the only OECD country without national paid parental leave.

Lead mechanism

HHS; Department of Labor; Senate HELP; House Education and Workforce.

Bipartisan framing

Conservative case

Labor-force attachment, parental choice, and family formation — with recent proposals from Sen. Rubio and a White House family-leave effort.

Progressive case

Universal paid leave and a maternal-health standard that closes a documented racial mortality gap.

Bipartisan leave proposals from Rubio, Gillibrand, and the prior Trump administration’s family-policy office.

D3 · Pillar D

Standalone page

Teacher-corps and K–12 modernization

10-year fiscal
+$95B netInvestment

Long-run productivity gains unscored in the 10-year window · Medium confidence

Implementation
Years 1–10
Y1Y10Y20
Middle class
Positive

No new household tax. Gains accrue through school quality in participating districts.

Planetary
Neutral

No material climate effect.

Description

A Federal Teacher Corps: fully funded master’s-level preparation with a four-year commitment to high-need districts, targeting a sub-15 percent admissions rate to match Finnish selectivity. State matching grants for a coherent core-standards floor at grades 3, 8, and 11; equalizing funding formulas; and nationally comparable teacher-quality assessment. Complements B6. Opt-in matching grants; the Corps operates independently of state adoption.

Global precedent

Finland’s National Board of Education and University of Helsinki teacher education; Singapore’s National Institute of Education. Both outperform the United States on PISA at comparable or lower per-pupil spend.

Lead mechanism

Department of Education; Senate HELP; House Education and Workforce.

Bipartisan framing

Conservative case

Teacher quality, national-service tradition, and outcome-based school improvement without a federal curriculum mandate.

Progressive case

Equalizing funding and a professionalized teaching corps for high-need districts.

National-service and Teach for America precedents; Race-to-the-Top-style incentive architecture.

D4 · Pillar D

Standalone page

Dual-track vocational and higher-ed reform

10-year fiscal
+$40B netInvestment

Gross ~$75B; offsets ~$35B; neutral by Year 8 · Medium-High confidence

Implementation
Years 4–8
Y1Y10Y20
Middle class
Strongly positive

Eliminates catastrophic student-debt exposure. About $15,000–$40,000 present value per household that uses either instrument.

Planetary
Modestly positive

Expands paid pathways into installation, manufacturing, and clean-energy trades.

Description

Three instruments: a federal-state matching fund for Swiss- and German-style dual-track vocational programs (three to four days a week paid apprenticeship plus classroom time); conversion of the federal student-loan portfolio to income-contingent repayment modeled on Australia’s HECS-HELP (automatic payroll collection, no defaults, inflation-indexed interest, retirement-age forgiveness); and Pell Grant vocational-track equivalence. Extends B6 and C3. Revenue-neutral by Year 8.

Global precedent

Switzerland’s dual VET (about two-thirds of upper-secondary students; youth unemployment consistently under 5 percent); Germany’s dual system; Australia’s HECS-HELP, operational since 1989 with no default mechanism.

Lead mechanism

Department of Education; Department of Labor; Senate HELP; House Education and Workforce.

Bipartisan framing

Conservative case

Apprenticeship expansion and an end to default-based student debt. Vocational pathways have been advanced across administrations.

Progressive case

Income-contingent repayment that removes catastrophic debt exposure and treats vocational study as equivalent to a four-year track.

D5 · Pillar D

Standalone page

Social housing and housing-cost stabilization

10-year fiscal
+$60BInvestment

Leverages ~$250B–$350B private and state co-investment · Medium confidence

Implementation
Years 4–20
Y1Y10Y20+
Middle class
Strongly positive

In high-cost metros, $6,000–$18,000 a year in avoided rent premium within seven years — the largest single Version 2 household item.

Planetary
Positive

Transit-adjacent, limited-profit housing lowers per-capita emissions relative to sprawl.

Description

A Federal Social Housing Revolving Fund seeded at $60 billion over ten years, providing construction financing to municipal, nonprofit, and limited-profit developers of permanently affordable rental housing on the Vienna model. A Housing First national initiative for chronic homelessness. Zoning-reform matching grants for states that remove single-family-only districts near transit. A public-option ground-lease trust for federally owned or federally financed land. Extends C1.

Global precedent

Vienna (60 percent of residents in city-owned or limited-profit housing; median 26 percent rent-to-income); Singapore’s HDB (more than 80 percent housed through public homeownership); Finland’s Housing First (chronic homelessness cut more than 65 percent from 2008 to 2022).

Lead mechanism

HUD; Treasury; Senate Banking; House Financial Services.

Bipartisan framing

Conservative case

Supply-side construction finance, zoning liberalization, and a revolving fund rather than an open-ended rental subsidy.

Progressive case

Permanently affordable social housing and a national Housing First response to chronic homelessness.

Municipal pilots are active in Chicago and Rhode Island; the federal role is capital provider, not landlord of last resort.

D6 · Pillar D

Standalone page

Mental health parity and 988 buildout

10-year fiscal
+$45B netInvestment

Gross ~$70B; offsets ~$25B · Medium-High confidence

Implementation
Years 1–6
Y1Y10Y20
Middle class
Positive

Parity enforcement and talking-therapies access reduce uncovered mental-health costs. No new household levy.

Planetary
Neutral

No material climate effect.

Description

Three components: mandatory parity enforcement — the same reimbursement rates, appointment-availability standards, and coverage limits for mental- and physical-health services in every federally funded plan, with a DOL ERISA-style enforcement mechanism; a national talking-therapies program modeled on UK NHS Talking Therapies (evidence-based short-course CBT with published outcome metrics); and sustained full funding of the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline with mobile crisis response in every U.S. county.

Global precedent

UK IAPT / NHS Talking Therapies (since 2008); Australia’s Better Access (since 2006). Documented returns of about 1.5–2.5 times over ten years.

Lead mechanism

HHS; SAMHSA; Department of Labor; Senate HELP; House Energy and Commerce.

Bipartisan framing

Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (2008), the Consolidated Appropriations Act (2020), and 988 authorization are recent bipartisan statutes. The buildout enforces those commitments.

D7 · Pillar D

Standalone page

Criminal justice and corrections modernization

10-year fiscal
+$28B net federalInvestment

State savings $12B–$20B a year at scale · Medium confidence

Implementation
Years 4–10
Y1Y10Y20
Middle class
Positive in affected communities

No household levy. Gains concentrate where incarceration and recidivism costs are highest.

Planetary
Modestly positive

A smaller prison estate reduces operational emissions and land use.

Description

Federal system: sentencing reform that prioritizes sentences of 12 months or less for non-violent offenses; rehabilitation-first federal facilities on the Halden model; and front-end diversion — drug courts, mental-health courts, veterans courts — scaled to national coverage. State partnership: a $20 billion federal matching-grant pool for states that adopt equivalent reforms, structured so recidivism-reducing states receive additional shares. Extends B9.

Global precedent

Netherlands (91 percent of sentences one year or less; 19 prisons closed since 2009); Germany (75 percent of sentences one year or less; recidivism about half the U.S. federal rate); Norway’s Halden Prison.

Lead mechanism

Department of Justice; Bureau of Prisons; Senate and House Judiciary.

Bipartisan framing

Conservative case

Fiscal discipline, public-safety effectiveness, and state-led adoption through matching grants.

Progressive case

Shorter sentences for non-violent offenses and rehabilitation infrastructure. The First Step Act (2018) is the recent bipartisan statute.

D8 · Pillar D

Standalone page

Community violence intervention and firearm public health

10-year fiscal
+$15BModest cost

Trauma-care and productivity offsets not scored · Medium confidence

Implementation
Years 1–3
Y1Y10Y20
Middle class
Positive

No new tax on the hold-harmless band. Benefits concentrate in communities with the highest firearm-injury rates.

Planetary
Neutral

No material climate effect.

Description

A federal Community Violence Intervention fund with per-capita grants to municipalities and community organizations operating evidence-based models (Cure Violence, hospital-based intervention, focused deterrence). Full CDC firearm-injury research funding restored. Universal background checks with a defined process for private-sale transfers. Federal support for state extreme-risk-protection-order programs. Safe-storage standards with a compliance tax credit. Because the U.S. constitutional landscape does not permit an Australian-style buyback, D8 emphasizes CVI and public-health components where U.S. evidence is strongest.

Global precedent

Australia’s 1996 National Firearms Agreement is the most-studied population-scale precedent; Cure Violence and hospital-based CVI provide the strongest U.S. evidence. CDC research funding was restored in FY2020 on a bipartisan basis.

Lead mechanism

HHS; CDC; Department of Justice; Senate Judiciary; House Energy and Commerce.

Bipartisan framing

Conservative case

Evidence-based municipal CVI, research funding, and safe-storage incentives rather than a federal confiscation program.

Progressive case

Background checks, ERPO support, and a public-health approach to firearm injury.

CVI is bipartisan at the municipal level; CDC firearm-injury research funding was restored in FY2020.

D9 · Pillar D

Standalone page

Points-plus-employer immigration modernization

10-year fiscal
+$160B revenueRevenue

$120B–$200B; administrative buildout ~$8B · Medium confidence

Implementation
Years 1–3
Y1Y10Y20
Middle class
Neutral to positive

Higher-earning complementary inflows. No household levy and no change in aggregate admission levels required for the score.

Planetary
Neutral

No material climate effect.

Description

Convert a portion of the employment-based visa system to a Canadian-style Comprehensive Ranking System — age, education, language, work experience, adaptability — with employer job offers as a point multiplier rather than a prerequisite. Clear the existing employment-based backlog on a defined timetable through per-country cap reform. Preserve and modernize family reunification as a non-competing track. A federal credential-recognition office to reduce foreign-professional underemployment. Operationalizes C5; C5 aggregate scoring is unchanged.

Global precedent

Canada Express Entry (operational since 2015; about six-month processing); Australia’s SkillSelect.

Lead mechanism

DHS (USCIS); Department of State; Senate and House Judiciary.

Bipartisan framing

Conservative case

Skills-based legal pathways, backlog clearance, and competitiveness — the RAISE Act is a recent analogue.

Progressive case

Family reunification preserved as a separate track; credential recognition reduces underemployment of arrivals already here.

D10 · Pillar D

Standalone page

Digital public infrastructure / once-only government

10-year fiscal
−$70B netSavings

Cost ~$18B; savings ~$88B · Medium confidence

Implementation
Years 1–10
Y1Y10Y20
Middle class
Positive

Faster benefits, licensing, and tax interactions. No new household reporting burden under the once-only rule.

Planetary
Modestly positive

A smaller, shared operational IT footprint.

Description

A Federal Digital Public Infrastructure Act: a federal X-Road-equivalent interoperability layer so agencies can query each other’s data on an authenticated, audited, per-request basis (the once-only principle); a portable federal e-identity, separated from the Social Security number, designed for authentication; a direct-benefit-transfer rail for federal-to-household payments; and an open-source civic-infrastructure toolkit for state and municipal permitting, licensing, and benefits applications. Extends F3 and F4.

Global precedent

Estonia’s X-Road (since 2001; about 2 percent of GDP in annual administrative-time savings); India’s DPI stack (Aadhaar, UPI, DBT); Denmark’s mit.dk.

Lead mechanism

OMB (OFCIO); GSA; agency-specific implementation.

Bipartisan framing

Technical rather than partisan. Extends the Foundation Layer digital-government work already in Version 1, with once-only compliance as the measurable target.

Figures in this framework are illustrative directional estimates derived from publicly available data and conventional Congressional Budget Office budget-window logic. They are not official CBO scores. Any provision adopted from this framework would require formal CBO scoring before legislative consideration. This document is a policy white paper, not an introduced bill.